Could an accident have caused COVID-19? Why the Wuhan lab-leak theory shouldn't be dismissed

Written by on March 22, 2021

Clink. Clink. Clink.

On a heat summer time night in July 2014, a laboratory employee on the Nationwide Institutes of Well being’s sprawling campus simply north of Washington, D.C., exited Constructing 29A toting a cardboard field. Its contents rattled inside – an assortment of fragile glass vials labeled with light typewriter script: Q fever, rickettsia and, worst of all, 4 strains of variola – the dreaded virus that causes smallpox.

Extremely contagious, variola is among the deadliest viruses the world has ever recognized. It may rip via a lot of the U.S. inhabitants and trigger a world well being catastrophe if launched. It killed as many as Three out of each 10 individuals contaminated earlier than it was declared eradicated from the planet in 1980.

Clink. Clink.

No person has been routinely vaccinated towards smallpox in a long time, leaving most individuals in america and world wide susceptible to an infection. But after forgotten specimen vials courting to the 1940s and 1950s had been found on the NIH in an unlocked chilly storage room, nothing was completed to make sure their secure transportation. They had been allowed to bump round in a cardboard field with dozens of different outdated organic specimens as a lone laboratory employee walked them to a different constructing about two blocks away, federal information present.

One vial had already shattered.

The world bought fortunate that day, because it typically has when security breaches happen at organic laboratories in america and world wide.

A lethal epidemic wasn’t unleashed. It was solely a tissue specimen that broke and no person bought sick.

“Had any of the six glass vials containing the Variola virus been breached, there would have been nothing to comprise the agent and forestall its launch to the encompassing setting,” in response to a joint investigation report by the FBI and federal lab regulators.

“I want to clarify that all hypotheses remain open and require further study,” said World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in February 2021.

“I need to make clear that each one hypotheses stay open and require additional examine,” stated World Well being Group Director-Common Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in February 2021.
Christopher Black, World Well being Group by way of AFP

As members of a World Well being Group skilled group have made worldwide headlines not too long ago dismissing as “extremely unlikely” the likelihood {that a} laboratory accident in Wuhan, China, may have sparked the COVID-19 pandemic, I can’t cease pondering of the tons of of lab accidents which are secretly occurring simply in america.

As an investigative reporter, I’ve spent greater than a decade revealing surprising security breaches that officers at laboratories in our personal nation don’t want the public to know about.

I’ve uncovered unique and lethal micro organism which have hitched rides out of high-security labs on employees’ soiled clothes, silently spreading contagion for weeks. I’ve revealed how spacesuit-like protecting gear and tubes carrying secure oxygen to scientists have torn or damaged – repeatedly – and high-tech security techniques have failed dramatically. Vials of viruses and micro organism have gone lacking. Researchers bitten by infected lab animals have been allowed to maneuver about in public – fairly than being quarantined – whereas ready for indicators of an infection to look.

These and related security lapses are taking place with disturbing regularity at elite U.S. labs operated by authorities companies, the army, universities and personal companies. There isn’t any cause to imagine they aren’t taking place at labs in different international locations as nicely.

The notion that greater than 2.7 million deaths worldwide – to this point – may very well be the results of a lab accident has been met with skepticism and derision by many journalists and scientists who typically painting it as a crackpot conspiracy idea fueled by former President Donald Trump’s China-bashing rhetoric. With out query, the lab-leak idea has been politically and racially weaponized in ugly methods. Nonetheless, that rhetoric must be separated from reputable questions on lab security which are deserving of investigation.

Science, like journalism, is meant to be about info and about attending to the reality. However those that dare search solutions to affordable questions on any lab accidents in Wuhan are accused of peddling conspiracies.

Let me be clear: Labs in Wuhan may not have performed any function within the origin of the pandemic. However a 12 months later, no supply has been discovered, and the world deserves a radical, unbiased investigation of all believable theories that’s performed with out worry or favor.

These and related security lapses are taking place with disturbing regularity at elite U.S. labs operated by authorities companies, the army, universities and personal companies.

It doesn’t matter what, it is a second for america and the world to take a tough take a look at the security of organic analysis labs and the dangers they will pose – as a result of issues at these amenities are actual. 

The WHO scientific team, which is searching for the pandemic’s origin, is anticipated to launch its last report this week detailing findings from their January journey to Wuhan, town the place the primary circumstances of COVID-19 had been recognized.

Earlier than leaving China final month, Peter Ben Embarek, the WHO scientist main the group, stated the group’s findings recommend it’s “extraordinarily unlikely” the pandemic was brought on by a laboratory accident at one in all Wuhan’s high-containment organic analysis amenities. These amenities embrace the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which makes a speciality of coronavirus analysis, gathering specimens from wild bats looking for new viruses and conducting experiments.

“It was most unlikely that something may escape from such a spot,” Ben Embarek said throughout the Feb. 9 information convention, citing the group’s discussions with Wuhan lab officers about their security protocols and audits. “In the event you take a look at the historical past of lab accidents, these are extraordinarily uncommon occasions.”

WHO group lands in Wuhan in hunt for virus origins

A world group of researchers arrived Thursday within the central Chinese language metropolis the place the coronavirus pandemic was first detected to conduct a politically delicate investigation into its origins, amid uncertainty about whether or not Beijing may attempt to stop embarrassing discoveries. (Jan. 14)


But lab accidents aren’t uncommon.

What’s uncommon are accidents inflicting documented outbreaks. However these have occurred, together with in 2004 when two researchers at a lab in Beijing unknowingly grew to become contaminated with one other sort of SARS coronavirus, sparking a small outbreak that killed one individual.

The chance {that a} laboratory-released virus – carried into the neighborhood by a employee who didn’t know they had been contaminated or via the leak of infectious waste – may trigger a lethal outbreak has been a rising concern for a few years.

In America, scientists and members of Congress – each Democrats and Republicans – and the nonpartisan Authorities Accountability Workplace have expressed considerations for years. In stories and hearings, they’ve apprehensive that the proliferation of laboratories working with high-risk pathogens is rising the combination menace of a deliberate or unintended lab launch inflicting a catastrophic outbreak.

“The general public is worried about these laboratories as a result of exposing employees and the general public to harmful pathogens, whether or not deliberate or unintended, can have disastrous penalties,” the GAO’s Nancy Kingsbury told Congress at a hearing in 2014.

If the COVID-19 pandemic had been discovered to have been brought on by a lab accident, it might have far-reaching implications for the fragmented and secretive oversight of organic analysis in america and worldwide that at the moment depends closely on the scientific neighborhood to police itself.

The prevailing idea among the many WHO skilled group and scientists worldwide is that the virus most likely developed in bats – as a result of they’re frequent hosts for a lot of sorts of coronaviruses – then it unfold to a different sort of animal earlier than leaping to people. This sort of “spillover” from animals to people is a standard supply of recent ailments. Thus far, nevertheless, no proof has been discovered that immediately ties the pandemic virus to an animal supply.

Members of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus arrive by car at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province on Feb. 3, 2021.

Members of the World Well being Group (WHO) group investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus arrive by automobile on the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province on Feb. 3, 2021.
HECTOR RETAMAL, AFP by way of Getty Photographs

The WHO team also announced that it supported continued investigation of one other probably associated idea, one promoted by China, that the virus may need arrived in Wuhan via imported frozen meals. The one idea the group stated was so unlikely it didn’t advantage additional investigation was the so-called lab-leak idea.

Inside days and with far much less fanfare and information protection, WHO Director-Common Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus appeared to stroll again the group’s dismissal of the lab accident idea, saying: “I need to make clear that each one hypotheses stay open and require additional examine.” 

Duct tape, tools failures and sloppy lab work

Like most individuals, I hadn’t ever given a lot thought to the security of organic analysis amenities. I simply assumed they had been impenetrable sterile fortresses, closely regulated and guarded, outfitted with layers of cutting-edge know-how and staffed by employees who zealously adhered to security protocols. 

Then in 2007, I began getting the primary of many recommendations on issues contained in the labs on the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention, which has a world repute for working the world’s premier public well being laboratories on its safe headquarters campus in Atlanta. On the time, I used to be the CDC beat reporter for The Atlanta Journal-Structure.

With the assistance of a tipster, I revealed that the CDC’s then-new $214 million infectious illness lab constructing – a crown jewel within the nation’s race to defend towards the specter of bioterrorism – suffered an hour-long energy outage from a lightning strike and the failure of its emergency backup turbines. The outage shut down key security techniques within the 368,000-square-foot concrete and glass analysis tower, recognized on the company as Constructing 18, together with specialised air stress techniques that assist guarantee deadly viruses stay inside particular person labs.

CDC's Building 18 houses numerous labs, including a suite of biosafety level 4 labs. Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act reveal a dramatic 2009 incident in a decontamination chamber in one of the BSL-4 labs.

What’s worse, I later obtained inside paperwork and emails exhibiting the CDC dismissed warnings from the company’s personal engineering employees, years earlier than the lab opened, that the backup energy system’s design “provides us no safety in any respect from many sorts of failures.”

Following up on one other tip, I revealed that scientists on this similar troubled constructing had been conducting experiments on a kind of harmful micro organism in a biosafety stage Three lab – the second-highest safety stage – the place the containment door was sealed with duct tape.

The tape was utilized across the edges of the door a 12 months earlier, after it was found {that a} malfunctioning air flow system was pulling probably contaminated air out of the lab right into a “clear” hallway, the place others within the constructing stroll round in road garments and lack any gear to guard towards an infection. 9 employees who had been within the fallout zone had been examined for potential publicity to the extremely infectious bacterium that causes Q fever, which is assessed as a possible bioterror agent and might trigger delicate to extreme signs, together with probably deadly coronary heart issues. Nobody was contaminated.

As I stood in entrance of the duct-taped door on a summer time day in 2008, escorted by 5 CDC officers, the top of the company’s occupational security program downplayed the importance of the duct tape. The general public was by no means at any threat, he stated, the lab was completely secure, and the air flow system had labored correctly within the time for the reason that incident occurred a 12 months earlier.

“Then why is the door nonetheless sealed with duct tape?” I requested.

“It’s an enhancement,” replied Patrick Stockton, who on the time was the CDC’s security and occupational well being supervisor. “We may take it off.”

Then why weren’t they eradicating it?

Take into consideration that: This was a brand new $214 million federal constructing that the CDC had touted again then because the world’s most superior laboratory. And but the CDC was counting on duct tape to assist safeguard towards the discharge of harmful bioterror micro organism.

In some ways, it was emblematic of what my reporting has discovered through the years about how labs and regulators strategy security.

Within the decade that adopted, as a member of USA TODAY’s nationwide investigative group, I reported on extra incidents on the CDC and scores of different U.S. labs operated by the federal authorities, universities and personal organizations throughout the nation.

  • On the Tulane Nationwide Primate Analysis Heart close to New Orleans, a kind of lethal micro organism not present in america, known as Burkholderia pseudomallei, escaped one of many facility’s high-security biosafety stage Three labs in 2014, infecting monkeys that lived in outside cages and had not been utilized in experiments. Federal regulators concluded the micro organism probably was carried out of the lab on employees’ contaminated clothes. The micro organism, which may trigger severe sickness in individuals and animals, can colonize soil and water in climates like Louisiana, although testing didn’t discover proof it had unfold into the setting.
  • On the College of Iowa, records showed that officers in 2014 found {that a} scientist had been conducting experiments with a genetically engineered pressure of the MERS virus – which causes a lethal and contagious respiratory illness in people – with out getting approval from the college’s biosafety committee.
  • Louisiana State College’s AgCenter in Baton Rouge was secretly cited by federal regulators in 2008 for serious biosafety lapses whereas researching Brucella micro organism, which poses a well being and financial menace to livestock. Security failures resulted in a cow in a close-by pasture – that was not concerned within the experiments – changing into contaminated, federal information confirmed. LSU additionally was cited for sending contaminated cattle to a slaughterhouse the place the meat was bought for individuals to eat.

A very alarming string of incidents in 2014 included the CDC probably exposing dozens of its employees to dwell anthrax and likewise having harmful mix-ups with specimens of Ebola virus and a lethal pressure of avian influenza.

In the meantime, in 2015 it was found that organic labs operated on the U.S. Military’s Dugway Proving Floor close to Salt Lake Metropolis had been mistakenly shipping live anthrax spores to labs world wide for a decade, the results of defective assumptions that the analysis specimens they had been sharing had been successfully killed – once they may truly nonetheless develop and kill.

A truck approaches the main gate at the US Army's Dugway Proving Ground in the middle of Rush Valley in Utah December 17, 2001.

A truck approaches the primary gate on the US Military’s Dugway Proving Floor in the course of Rush Valley in Utah December 17, 2001.
GEORGE FREY, AFP/Getty Photographs

In an award-winning 2015 USA TODAY investigation known as “Biolabs in Your Backyard,” our group revealed that greater than 100 U.S. labs working with potential bioterror pathogens had confronted secret federal sanctions for security violations, and that regulators had allowed them to maintain conducting experiments whereas failing inspections, typically for years. Among the many labs with a few of the worst regulatory information, we discovered, had been labs operated by some of the same federal agencies which are charged with regulating laboratory security.

Laboratory accidents proceed to occur throughout america. However the public hardly ever hears about them as a result of pervasive secrecy obscures failings by labs and likewise by regulators.

There isn’t any common, obligatory requirement for reporting lab accidents or lab-associated infections with harmful pathogens, our USA TODAY investigation discovered. And even when labs lose their permits to work with harmful pathogens due to severe security violations, the federal government retains the labs’ names secret, citing safety considerations and a federal bioterrorism legislation.

In keeping with paperwork I obtained not too long ago utilizing the federal Freedom of Data Act, U.S. laboratories reported greater than 450 accidents throughout 2015 via 2019 whereas experimenting with a few of the world’s most harmful pathogens – these topic to federal regulation as a result of they “pose a extreme menace” to well being and still have the potential to be become bioweapons. These pathogens, which the U.S. authorities calls “select agents,” embrace anthrax, Ebola, plague, lethal strains of avian influenza and sorts of SARS coronaviruses.

The protection breaches reported to the U.S. Federal Choose Agent Program – which is collectively run by the CDC and the U.S. Division of Agriculture – ranged from animal bites and needle sticks to failures of security tools and errors that resulted in infectious particles changing into airborne inside labs.

In almost all reported circumstances, regulators deemed the breaches severe sufficient to place employees liable to changing into contaminated, this system’s annual stories to Congress present. In consequence, greater than 660 U.S. scientists and different lab employees concerned within the incidents underwent medical evaluation or therapy with preventative medicines.

The excellent news is that just about none of those lab employees bought sick, in response to the stories, which give solely statistics and no personalised particulars. However just a few – with out realizing it – grew to become contaminated, going about their lives at dwelling and in public for months. Their exposures had been recognized solely as a result of their lab occurred to conduct annual blood exams, checking for antibodies to analysis pathogens, one thing that federal regulators don’t require. Fortuitously, the organisms they had been working with had been sorts of micro organism that, whereas harmful, don’t unfold simply from individual to individual. 

However what if a lab employee had been unknowingly uncovered to one thing way more contagious, a virus that may infect others earlier than any signs seem?

How viruses can escape

There are a number of methods a pathogen can “escape” a laboratory and trigger a public outbreak.

A lab employee can turn out to be contaminated due to a failure in security tools or procedures. Typically these infections, akin to these involving pathogens that unfold via contaminated air or via invisible aerosolized droplets, happen with out the employee even realizing a security breach has occurred.

Viruses and micro organism even have the potential to be carried out of labs on contaminated clothes and tools, or via a mishap within the sterilization of the lab’s stable or liquid waste.

Whereas uncommon, lab accidents inflicting documented outbreaks that unfold to individuals or animals have occurred.

An influenza epidemic in 1977 that unfold all through the world was discovered to have been brought on by a pressure of the virus that seemed to be almost similar to 1 that hadn’t circulated for the reason that 1950s. Many scientists imagine that it was not a naturally occurring outbreak, and that it probably was the results of a saved virus specimen that was launched via a laboratory accident or probably a vaccine development project.

In 2007, herds of cattle in Surrey, United Kingdom, started creating painful blisters on their tongues, lips and ft – and had been rapidly recognized with extremely infectious foot-and-mouth illness, one of the vital dreaded and economically devastating ailments for livestock house owners as a result of it weakens animals’ potential for use for milk and meat manufacturing.

The cattle had been sickened by a pressure of FMD Virus from a 1967 epidemic – a pressure that was getting used at a laboratory and vaccine manufacturing complicated in Pirbright, not removed from the place the cattle fell in poor health. British security regulators concluded that the outbreak was probably brought on by leaking wastewater from the Pirbright facility’s drain pipes, which contaminated close by soil with dwell virus after which was picked up on automobile tires and carried to the herds.

Coronaviruses much like the one inflicting the COVID-19 pandemic have repeatedly escaped labs.

In 2003 and 2004 – within the months after intense worldwide efforts managed to comprise the unfold of what was then the primary sort of lethal SARS coronavirus to contaminate individuals across the globe – a collection of laboratory accidents threatened to reignite the epidemic that had sickened about 8,000 individuals in 29 international locations, killing almost 800 of them. This coronavirus virus, which emerged in 2002, causes a illness known as extreme acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, that killed at a higher rate than the equally named SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.

First, a 27-year-old researcher in Singapore working with specimens of West Nile virus grew to become contaminated with the SARS virus in a shared laboratory that used “inappropriate” lab safety practices. Investigators concluded the an infection was brought on by unintended contamination of the researcher’s West Nile virus specimens with the SARS virus. Each viruses had been found in a analysis specimen the scientist had used earlier than changing into in poor health. No person else was sickened.  

Then, three months later at a laboratory in Taiwan, a 44-year-old researcher became infected with SARS, probably by cleansing up spilled liquid waste in December 2003. He flew to attend a gathering in Singapore and didn’t present indicators of sickness till he returned dwelling, developed a fever and was hospitalized. Greater than 70 individuals who had contact with him had been quarantined.

“Within the post-epidemic interval the best threat from SARS could also be via publicity in laboratories the place the virus is used or saved,” the WHO said in an update in regards to the Taiwan lab incident in December 2003.

Regardless of the WHO’s warnings, in April 2004 an outbreak in China started after two researchers working at a virology lab in Beijing grew to become contaminated by the SARS virus. Earlier than the outbreak was contained, 9 individuals had been contaminated. The mother of one of the researchers died.

It was unclear how the 2 researchers had been uncovered. “Neither of the researchers is thought to have immediately performed experiments utilizing dwell SARS coronavirus. Nonetheless, investigators have severe considerations about biosafety procedures on the Institute – together with how and the place procedures utilizing SARS coronavirus had been carried out, and the way and the place SARS coronavirus samples had been saved,” the WHO said in a May 2004 update after the outbreak had been contained.

No particular accident was recognized on the laboratory, the WHO stated, “and it’s conceivable that a precise reply could by no means be decided.”

Wuhan lab scientist apprehensive about leak

Towards this backdrop, it’s stunning that questions on any lab accidents in Wuhan proceed to be dismissed as selling a conspiracy idea.  

When the pandemic first emerged in Wuhan, a lab accident appeared a really actual and horrifying risk to China’s main coronavirus researcher.

Shi Zhengli, a famend scientist on the Wuhan Institute of Virology, has spent years gathering virus samples from bats and experimenting with SARS-like viruses to find out which could pose the best threat to people.

In an interview with Scientific American, Shi described a frantic assessment of her lab’s information throughout the early days of the outbreak to see whether or not there had been any incidents, particularly associated to the disposal of supplies utilized in experiments. Shi stated she was relieved when her lab discovered the genetic sequence of the virus sickening individuals in Wuhan didn’t match any of the viruses her group had collected.

“That basically took a load off my thoughts,” she informed the journal for an article revealed final 12 months. “I had not slept a wink for days.”

Shi has expressed outrage at public hypothesis since final spring by then-President Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo {that a} lab in Wuhan could also be liable for the pandemic.

Diplomatic cables, first reported by The Washington Post, confirmed that the U.S. Embassy in Beijing in 2018 raised considerations about security practices contained in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the place China’s first biosafety stage four laboratory had not too long ago turn out to be operational, enabling the power to do way more harmful experiments.

“Throughout interactions with scientists on the WIV laboratory, they famous the brand new lab has a severe scarcity of appropriately educated technicians and investigators wanted to soundly function this high-containment laboratory,” stated one of many cables from January 2018.

Within the last days of the Trump administration, Pompeo’s State Division posted on its website a fact sheet titled, “Exercise on the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” The doc makes clear that the U.S. authorities doesn’t know the place, when or how the COVID-19 virus was initially transmitted to people.

Even so, it known as for better scrutiny of knowledge it stated the U.S. authorities has discovered in regards to the facility, together with that the virology institute has been doing categorized analysis with China’s army since at the very least 2017 and that a number of researchers on the institute grew to become sick in autumn 2019, earlier than the primary recognized case of the outbreak. However no particulars had been supplied within the truth sheet.

White Home nationwide safety adviser Jake Sullivan

We’ve got deep considerations about the way in which wherein the early findings of the COVID-19 investigation had been communicated and questions in regards to the course of used to achieve them.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology was among the many areas visited not too long ago by the joint China-WHO scientific group searching for the supply of the COVID-19 pandemic. Members of the WHO group stated they had been assured, throughout conversations with employees on the institute and at different organic labs in Wuhan, {that a} laboratory accident was extraordinarily unlikely to be the pandemic’s supply.

Within the weeks since leaving Wuhan, the WHO’s group has been questioned about its independence and depth, together with by the Biden administration, amid information stories that China denied the team access to uncooked information on potential COVID-19 circumstances that had been recognized throughout the earliest a part of the outbreak.

 “We’ve got deep considerations about the way in which wherein the early findings of the COVID-19 investigation had been communicated and questions in regards to the course of used to achieve them,” White Home nationwide safety adviser Jake Sullivan said in a statement last month. “It’s crucial that this report be unbiased, with skilled findings free from intervention or alteration by the Chinese language authorities.”

A world group of scientists and researchers has issued an open letter calling for an unbiased investigation, separate from the WHO effort, which they are saying has lacked the independence, experience and entry wanted to adequately examine the supply of the pandemic, together with the potential for a lab accident. “Efforts up to now don’t represent a radical, credible, and clear investigation,” the letter, published by The Wall Street Journal, said.

We would by no means know whether or not the COVID-19 pandemic began in one in all Wuhan’s laboratories. However what is thought is that because the variety of these sorts of high-security labs grows worldwide and extra researchers are storing and experimenting with harmful pathogens, so too does the danger of laboratory accidents inflicting outbreaks.

That’s why all of us have a stake in figuring out what is occurring in these labs right here in america and world wide.

Alison Young is an investigative reporter in Washington, D.C. Throughout 2009-19, she was a reporter and member of USA TODAY’s nationwide investigative group. Observe her on Twitter: @alisonannyoung

Reader's opinions

Leave a Reply

Current track



Current show


6:00 pm 9:00 pm

Current show


6:00 pm 9:00 pm