DOJ Sues Georgia, Says GOP-Backed Restrictions Unlawfully Target Black Voters
Written by Black Voices on June 25, 2021
The Justice Division sued the state of Georgia on Friday over a restrictive voting regulation handed in response to former President Donald Trump’s lies about mass voter fraud within the 2020 election.
The lawsuit alleges that the Georgia regulation was enacted with the aim of denying or abridging the rights of Black voters within the state. The Justice Division says Georgia’s regulation was handed by way of a rushed course of that departed from regular process, and contained provisions ― together with limits on drop containers for absentee ballots and on offering meals and water to voters ready in lengthy strains ― that have been handed with illegal discriminatory intent.
The Georgia legislature enacted the regulation “with information of the disproportionate impact that these provisions … would have on Black voters’ capability to take part within the political course of on an equal foundation with white voters,” the go well with says. The criticism famous that an “total rise in Black political success” lately in Georgia “occurred in opposition to the backdrop of virulent racial appeals” together with racist robocalls geared toward Stacey Abrams. The lawsuit additionally factors to anti-Semitic assaults on now-Sen. Jon Ossoff and racist assaults on now-Sen. Raphael Warnock.
“One cellphone caller threatened to behead Reverend Warnock and referred to the church at which he’s a pastor, Ebenezer Baptist ― the church as soon as pastored by Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. ― utilizing a vile racial epithet. The church needed to filter feedback on its social media pages given the numerous variety of racist feedback regarding Rev. Warnock’s candidacy,” the Justice Division lawsuit states.
Although the lawsuit doesn’t identify him, the Justice Division additionally factors to an occasion by which former Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) “mispronounced and mocked the pronunciation of then-Senator Kamala Harris’ first identify throughout a marketing campaign occasion, regardless of having been her Senate colleague for 4 years.”
Even though claims about mass fraud within the election have been debunked, the lawsuit mentioned, “white state legislators persistently relied on these debunked allegations of voter fraud to justify their enactment of SB 202, even after being warned by different legislators in regards to the disproportionately damaging results the invoice would have on Black Georgians’ capability to forged ballots.”
The lawsuit is being filed eight years to the day after the Supreme Courtroom, in a majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, struck down key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. These provisions required states with a historical past of racist voting legal guidelines to get preclearance from the federal authorities earlier than implementing new voting legal guidelines.
Three longtime voting rights advocates ― Affiliate Lawyer Common Vanita Gupta, Assistant Lawyer Common Kristen Clarke and Principal Deputy Assistant Lawyer Common Pam Karlan ― now maintain key positions on the Justice Division.
Lawyer Common Merrick Garland mentioned earlier this month that the Biden administration would “rededicate the assets of the Division of Justice to a essential a part of its unique mission: imposing federal regulation to guard the franchise for all eligible voters.”
The division plans to rent extra employees to work on voting rights instances. Garland mentioned the division would double its employees inside 30 days.
“There are numerous issues open to debate in America,” Garland mentioned. “However the fitting of all eligible residents to vote isn’t considered one of them. The fitting to vote is the cornerstone of our democracy, the fitting from which all different rights finally movement.”
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Join membership to develop into a founding member and assist form HuffPost’s subsequent chapter