Pregnant Meghan Markle Was ‘Unprotected’ By Royal Family Against Tabloids: Lawsuit

Written by on July 1, 2020

 Meghan Markle was left “unprotected” by the royal household throughout her being pregnant and unable to defend herself from “a whole bunch of hundreds of inaccurate articles” as a result of palace’s media coverage, her authorized group argues in new courtroom paperwork obtained by HuffPost on Wednesday.

The revelations are a part of the Duchess of Sussex’s ongoing lawsuit with Related Newspapers Restricted, which owns the Day by day Mail and the Mail on Sunday.

The case, which issues problems with privateness, copyright infringement and the breach of the Information Safety Act 2018, facilities on the Mail on Sunday’s publication of excerpts of a non-public letter that Meghan wrote to her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018.

Related Newspapers argues that its publication of the private letter on Feb. 9, 2019 was justified, provided that certainly one of Meghan’s unnamed pals’ spoke of the letter’s existence in a Individuals journal function printed three days earlier.

The brand new paperwork, which present the intense steps the duchess took to maintain the letter from being intercepted by others, state that Meghan didn’t know it will be “revealed or referred to by any media outlet” as she “wouldn’t have consented to this.” 

The Duchess of Sussex attends the Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Championships in July 2018. 

The Duchess of Sussex attends the Wimbledon Garden Tennis Championships in July 2018. 

Meghan’s authorized protection additionally denies that the duchess knew of the existence of the interview together with her pals or that she instructed them to intervene on her behalf. As a substitute, her attorneys say the Duchess of Sussex discovered in regards to the Individuals journal story on the day that it was printed. 

The Duchess of Sussex’s authorized group says that Meghan was conscious, nevertheless, in January 2019, whereas she was pregnant, that her pals “have been extraordinarily apprehensive about her psychological well being and the influence which the false portrayal of her within the media was having on her and that they needed to appropriate this.”

Meghan “had develop into the topic of a lot of false and damaging articles by the UK tabloid media,” the paperwork say, calling out Related Newspapers Restricted for articles that reportedly brought on her “super emotional misery and injury to her psychological well being.” 

“As her pals had by no means seen her on this state earlier than, they have been rightly involved for her welfare, particularly as she was pregnant, unprotected by the Establishment, and prohibited from defending herself,” the paperwork state. 

The paperwork say the Kensington Palace communications group had a coverage of asking Meghan’s family and friends to say “no remark” to media requests, which led to Meghan’s pals “feeling silenced,” and certain contributed to their nameless participation within the Individuals article.

Prince Harry and Meghan.

Prince Harry and Meghan.

“The stance of ‘no remark’ was taken by the KP Communications Crew with none dialogue with or approval by the Claimant, as is commonplace follow for Royal communications,” the paperwork mentioned, indicating that Meghan didn’t agree with the media coverage.

“Had the Claimant been requested or been given the chance to take part, she would have requested the KP Communications Crew to say on the file that she had not been concerned with the Individuals journal article, as she had not been.”

In October 2019, Prince Harry slammed the UK tabloid media’s “ruthless marketing campaign” and manipulative techniques in opposition to Meghan throughout her being pregnant in a press release saying the duchess’ lawsuit.

“My spouse has develop into one of many newest victims of a British tabloid press that wages campaigns in opposition to people with no thought to the results — a ruthless marketing campaign that has escalated over the previous 12 months, all through her being pregnant and whereas elevating our new child son,” Harry mentioned on the time, denouncing sure publications who created “lie after lie at her expense” whereas she was on maternity depart.

Subscribe to HuffPost’s Watching the Royals publication for all issues Windsor (and past).

Reader's opinions

Leave a Reply

Current track



Current show


1:00 pm 2:00 pm

Current show


1:00 pm 2:00 pm