The Grammys were even more inclusive this year. The Oscars should take notes.
Written by B87FM on April 4, 2022
Sure, the 64th annual awards in Las Vegas, which aired Sunday on CBS, honored a various array of performers – from track and report of the 12 months winners Silk Sonic to greatest new artist Olivia Rodrigo to album of the 12 months winner Jon Batiste.
However the Recording Academy reminded us that an awards present will be inclusive in all types of different methods, too – one thing different reveals just like the Oscars ought to implement. Like, yesterday.
Performers once more electrified the Grammys stage with ardour and poise: The jovial Batiste. Queer artists Lil Nas X, Brandi Carlile and T.J. Osborne, half of the Brothers Osborne. Spanish-language singers J. Balvin and Maria Becerra. Ok-Pop sensation BTS. The soulful, swoon-worthy John Legend, joined by Ukrainian performers in a gut-wrenching tribute to the nation, now below assault from Russia.
Our Grammys stay weblog:John Legend performs tribute to Ukraine, President Zelenskyy appears virtually
Viewers additionally glimpsed snippets of performances from lesser-known artists from the MGM Grand’s rooftop throughout many genres, together with Cuban singer Aymée Nuviola and up to date worship group Maverick Metropolis Music.
This 12 months’s present even made an effort to acknowledge those that not often obtain any consideration in any respect: behind-the-scenes tour employees launched their bosses, together with Billie Eilish, Chris Stapleton and H.E.R.
Even E!’s red-carpet protection joined in on the spirit of inclusion, with signal language interpreters often accompanying artists throughout host Laverne Cox interviews for the profit of deaf or hard-of-hearing viewers.
What if the Oscars tamped down its makes an attempt at relevance – like chopping eight classes from the stay present and changing that point with cringe-worthy gags – and as an alternative elevated extra behind-the-scenes assist employees that assist make films occur?
As a substitute of Amy Schumer jokingly calling Kirsten Dunst a seat filler, for instance, why not acknowledge lower-profile Oscar nominees within the quick movie or make-up and hairstyling classes? And a movie’s assistant director might introduce a montage for greatest image of the 12 months.
One reminder from this 12 months’s Grammys: it isn’t simply the largest classes that make for essentially the most compelling acceptance speeches.
Take Jazmine Sullivan’s for greatest R&B album. She says she wrote the venture to cope with her personal disgrace over decisions she made in her 20s, However “Heaux Tales” blossomed into “a secure house for Black girls to inform their tales, for us to be taught from one another, snort with one another, and never be exploited on the similar time,” she mentioned. “And that is what I am most grateful for. So shout-out to all Black girls who’re simply residing their lives.” (Sullivan lastly received her first two Grammys this 12 months after receiving greater than a dozen nominations since 2009.)
After all, the Grammys stay imperfect. Music’s greatest night time has been removed from proof against previous controversies – notably in the case of variety and inclusion in its nominees and winners.
The previous few years have introduced the #GrammysSoMale hashtag, protesting the shortage of feminine winners, and in response, former Recording Academy President Neil Portnow suggesting that girls must “step up” to be acknowledged; artists lamenting the awards’ therapy of Black music; and Ok-Pop teams failing to make vital headway in main classes.
The Academy has made sweeping efforts to diversify its ranks, growing a process power months after its January 2018 ceremony celebrated principally males and pop music.
See all of the Grammys winners:Which stars have already won tonight
It made headway final 12 months by awarding Grammys to Beyoncé, Megan Thee Stallion and H.E.R., and featured performances from artists like Mickey Guyton, Dangerous Bunny and Cardi B.
The group has additionally labored to diversify membership, created inclusive initiatives and eradicated its controversial nomination evaluate committees – panels that selected nominees from a listing of those that acquired essentially the most votes. Nominees at the moment are primarily based purely on votes solid by the academy’s 11,000-plus voting members.
Questions have loomed for years across the nominations course of, with music trade gamers calling for extra transparency.
And the academy’s objective is to double the variety of feminine members by 2025, and it’s greater than midway there.
The awards present has additionally constructed extra inclusion into its broadcast behind the scenes: The Grammys introduced final fall that it had adopted an inclusion rider for the 2022 ceremony, an settlement requiring producers to audition, interview and rent folks from teams which have been traditionally and systematically excluded from the trade. CBS additionally included audio description for the stay telecast for the primary time.
“From a ‘entrance of digital camera’ perspective, the Grammys seem to have been fairly various and inclusive – from race to gender and different components of variety, track choices and artist performances,” says Angela Reddock-Wright, an employment lawyer and mediator who works with the leisure trade. “The true query is what is going on behind the scenes and whether or not the Grammy group is honoring its dedication to require an inclusion rider for the 2022 Grammys.” She notes the success of this rider has not been made public.
Nonetheless, “it seems the group, just like the Academy of Movement Image Arts and Sciences, which awards the Oscars, has made nice strides,” she provides.
Total the Grammys bested the Oscars this 12 months when it comes to inclusion, past simply winners. However each awards present ought to sing the Grammys’ tune.
Contributing: Melissa Ruggieri, USA TODAY, and The Related Press
‘We welcome the suggestions’:Recording Academy exec teases Grammy night, talks Drake controversy