Ukraine, midterms and Build Back Better: White House plays cleanup after Biden’s marathon press conference

Written by on January 21, 2022

BIden’s press convention left the White Home issuing statements and fielding questions. This is a breakdown of what Biden mentioned, the backlash (or confusion) and the way the White Home addressed it.

Present Caption
Conceal Caption

President Biden says ‘we’re in a greater place’ in first 2022 tackle

President Biden provides his first presidential tackle of 2022.


WASHINGTON — After a yr of avoiding common solo press conferences and frequent interviews with reporters, President Joe Biden took the alternative strategy Wednesday.

For 1 hour and 51 minutes, Biden stood at a lectern within the White Home East room, fielding greater than 180 questions from 24 reporters. Nearly no problem went untouched.

It was a push to reset the narrative after a collection of setbacks and floundering ballot numbers. Biden touted an enhancing economic system and his administration’s handing of COVID-19, whereas reminding People of two overshadowed legislative wins: passage of the American Rescue Plan and a historic bipartisan infrastructure regulation. 

“You wish to go for an additional hour or two?” Biden mentioned greater than midway in.

However alongside the way in which, Biden – recognized for his share of gaffes – made a number of statements that raised eyebrows.

One on Russian army escalation on Ukraine’s border prompted a rebuke from Ukraine’s president. One other on the legitimacy of the 2022 midterm elections drew comparisons to former President Donald Trump. And Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi appeared miffed about Biden’s description of passing his Construct Again Higher agenda in “chunks.”

It prompted the White Home to play clean-up Thursday, issuing statements and fielding inquiries to make clear the president’s place.

Extra: Biden’s new Construct Again Higher technique: 5 takeaways from his lengthy (and feisty) press convention

Extra: ‘A monumental step ahead’: Biden hails Home passage of $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure invoice

This is a breakdown of what Biden mentioned throughout Wednesday’s press convention, the backlash (or confusion) and the way the White Home addressed it. 

1. A ‘minor incursion’ into Ukraine

What Biden mentioned: Addressing Russia’s army presence alongside the Ukraine’s border, Biden mentioned a “minor incursion” by Russia into Ukraine may not benefit a powerful worldwide response.

It got here because the president was requested why sanctions would deter Russian President Vladimir Putin from invading Ukraine when they have not labored previously. 

“I believe what you are going to see is that Russia will probably be held accountable if it invades. And it relies on what it does,” Biden mentioned. “It is one factor if it is a minor incursion after which we find yourself having a battle about what to do and never do, and so forth.”

Extra: ‘There aren’t any minor incursions’: Ukrainian president rebukes Biden over remarks on Russian invasion

He added: “But when they really do what they’re able to doing with the forces amassed on the border, it’s going to be a catastrophe for Russia.” 

Requested to make clear later within the press convention what he meant by “minor incursion,” Biden mentioned if Russian pursues “one thing considerably wanting a big invasion.” He pointed to cyberattacks for example. 

The backlash: Biden’s feedback triggered rapid criticism from Republican lawmakers. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, the highest Republican on the Home Overseas Affairs Committee, mentioned Biden gave Putin “the inexperienced gentle to launch a ‘minor incursion'”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky took problem as effectively, tweeting, “We wish to remind the good powers that there aren’t any minor incursions and small nations. Simply as there aren’t any minor casualties and little grief from the lack of family members. I say this because the President of an important energy.”

The cleanup: Shortly after the press convention, Psaki issued a press release that mentioned the president has been clear with Putin that “if any Russian army forces transfer throughout the Ukrainian border, that’s a renewed invasion, and it will likely be met with a swift, extreme, and united response from the US and our Allies.”

Extra: ‘My guess is he’ll transfer in’: Biden predicts Russia will invade Ukraine in two-hour information convention

Psaki on Thursday Biden’s “minor incursion” comment referred to the vary of ways Russian has undertaken previously together with  cyberattacks and “the little inexperienced males.”

“The purpose he was making is that we’ve a spread of instruments,” Psaki mentioned. 

Biden reaffirmed his place to reporters earlier than a gathering along with his infrastructure job power Thursday.  “I have been completely clear with President Putin,” Biden mentioned. “He has no misunderstanding. If any – any – assembled Russian items transfer throughout the Ukrainian border, that’s an invasion.”

2. An ‘illegitimate’ election

What Biden mentioned: Biden was requested whether or not the 2022 midterm elections may in any manner be illegitimate if Republican-controlled state legislatures transfer forward with new voting restrictions and federal voting rights laws is not handed.

“I believe it simply might be illegitimate,” Biden mentioned. “Think about if, actually, Trump has succeeded in convincing Pence to not depend the votes.”

The reporter clarified that he was asking about this yr’s midterm elections, not a presidential election. 

Biden mentioned, “The rise and the prospect of being illegitimate is in direct proportion to us not having the ability to get these reforms handed.

Extra: White Home says Biden ‘not casting doubt’ on 2022 midterms after saying elections might be ‘illegitimate’

The backlash: Republicans pounced on the feedback, calling it a double-standard for Biden to name into query the legitimacy of the 2022 election after Democrats slammed Trump for doing simply that in 2020.  

Even earlier than votes have been forged, Trump launched a year-long assault on mail-voting and mentioned the outcomes could be rigged. After he misplaced, Trump mentioned the election was stolen and made a collection of baseless, false claims and lawsuits alleging fraud. 

“It’s irresponsible for an American president, in any manner, to delegitimize an election,” Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, a Trump critic, mentioned. “With out query, our elections are honest and bonafide. This is similar unlucky path our former president went down and as we all know, it’s a harmful and extremely divisive course. It was unacceptable then and it’s unacceptable now.”

The cleanup: On Thursday, Psaki issued a press release saying Biden “was not casting doubt on the legitimacy of the 2022 election. He was making the alternative level.” She pointed to document turnout within the 2020 election within the face of a pandemic.

“He was explaining that the outcomes could be illegitimate if states do what the previous president requested them to do after the 2020 election: toss out ballots and overturn outcomes after the very fact. The Huge Lie is placing our democracy in danger. We’re combating to guard it.”

Throughout Thursday’s White Home press briefing, Psaki was requested whether or not the president believes the 2022 election is reputable if nothing is modified and federal voting rights laws just isn’t adopted.

“Sure,” Psaki mentioned. 

3. Passing Construct Again Higher in ‘huge chunks’

What Biden mentioned: Biden mentioned he would probably must go his $1.75 trillion social-spending plan, Construct Again Higher,” in “huge chunks” with it stalled within the Senate.

“I’m assured we are able to get items, huge chunks of the Construct Again Higher regulation signed into regulation,” Biden mentioned. 

Later within the information convention, he was requested whether or not meaning he is contemplating breaking the package deal into particular person parts. The Construct Again Higher plan contains sponsored youngster care, common pre-Okay, prescription drug worth measures, dwelling caregiving enlargement and an assortment of local weather initiatives. 

Extra: Biden’s Construct Again Higher invoice would velocity up conversion to electrical mail vans at struggling USPS

“It is clear to me that we will must most likely break it up,” Biden mentioned, including that he thinks he can get not less than an preliminary $500 billion for vitality and environmental points handed. He mentioned among the invoice’s opponents “assist various the issues in there,” singling out Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., who has opposed the invoice. Biden mentioned Manchin helps elements reminiscent of pre-Okay.

“I suppose we are able to break the package deal up, get as a lot as we are able to now, and are available again and battle for the remainder later.”

The backlash: This did not lead to a backlash, per se, however confusion over semantics. Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi took exception with the president’s phrase selection of “chunks,” although signaled assist for a smaller Construct Again Higher invoice.

“Chunks is an attention-grabbing phrase,” she mentioned. “What the president calls ‘chunks,’ I’d hope could be a significant invoice going ahead. It might be extra restricted however it’s nonetheless important.”

Pelosi mentioned members of her occasion who’ve prompt breaking apart the invoice into smaller ones are ignoring the reconciliation price range course of Democrats want to make use of so as to circumvent a Republican filibuster within the Senate. 

“This can be a reconciliation invoice. When individuals say, ‘let’s divide it up,’ they do not perceive the method,” she mentioned.

Pelosi added “we might must rename” the invoice.

The cleanup: Psaki clarified the president’s place throughout Thursday’s press briefing, saying Biden desires to get as a lot as doable handed within the current Construct Again Higher invoice by means of the price range reconciliation course of.

“He is speaking about getting a giant chunk, as a lot as you may get finished the place we are able to get settlement of 50 members of the Senate,” Psaki mentioned. 

She mentioned proper now the White Home is “figuring out how huge that chunk be,” noting that something proposed individually outdoors of the reconciliation course of would want 60 votes. That might require the assist of 10 Republicans. 

Contributing: Matthew Brown, Rebecca Morin, Courtney Subramanian 

Attain Joey Garrison on Twitter @joeygarrison.

Reader's opinions

Leave a Reply

Current track



Current show

87 After Dark

12:00 am 1:55 am

Current show

87 After Dark

12:00 am 1:55 am