Mally Mall Locked Up Again For Trying To Bribe Witness

Federal custody just became Mally Mall’s reality again after prosecutors say he’s been playing games with his probation.

The Las Vegas Hip-Hop producer is facing serious allegations that he tried to silence a witness before his upcoming revocation hearing, and that’s only the beginning of his problems.

According to court records obtained by 8 News Now, Mally Mall allegedly used an intermediary named Steven Tolson, also known as Jazz Lazr, to reach out to a woman and offer her cash to skip his July 7 hearing.

The woman was supposedly told to sign documents claiming she was never trafficked and to keep quiet about her involvement with him. That’s witness tampering, plain and simple.

But there’s more.

Federal authorities say he’s been communicating with Tarnita Woodard, a woman he was explicitly court-ordered to have zero contact with. The court had verbally named her as someone he couldn’t reach out to, yet prosecutors claim he maintained ongoing communication with her anyway.

Witnesses reportedly described them as engaged, and Woodard was allegedly living with him and driving his vehicles as recently as May 2026.

[embedded content]

The violations don’t stop there. A petition filed in June flagged that Mally Mall made an unauthorized stop at a Cheesecake Factory in Henderson and was found connected to luxury vehicles he never disclosed to his probation officer.

We’re talking a Mercedes-Maybach, a white Rolls-Royce, and a Bentley. This is particularly wild considering he’d previously filed for bankruptcy.

Mally Mall’s current legal troubles stem from his 2021 conviction when he pleaded guilty to operating escort services across Clark County between 2002 and 2014 that functioned as fronts for prostitution.

Judge Gloria Navarro sentenced him to 33 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release, and he’s been on thin ice ever since.

A federal judge previously denied his request to end probation early, citing the seriousness of his crimes and the harm to victims.

The court will now decide whether these latest allegations warrant revoking his supervised release entirely and imposing additional prison time.

.mobile_only_ad{display:none;}@media only screen and (max-width:767px){.mobile_only_ad{display:block;}} .comments-area{display:block!important}