Reagan-Appointed Federal Judge in Boston Novel Take Down Of Trump Has Everyone Talking
Written by b87fm on 10/01/2025
A new 161-page federal ruling from U.S. District Judge William Young is drawing headlines — not just for its legal impact, but for its unusually candid tone toward President Donald Trump’s administration.
Young, a Reagan appointee, framed the opinion as a response to an anonymous postcard he received that read,
“TRUMP HAS PARDONS AND TANKS…..WHAT DO YOU HAVE?”
The judge’s lengthy response doesn’t just tackle the case at hand; it reads as a broad indictment of Trump’s approach to law, governance, and accountability.
The ruling stems from a case challenging the administration’s treatment of noncitizen pro-Palestinian individuals. Young concluded that the federal government targeted these individuals for deportation primarily because of their First Amendment-protected speech, writing that the actions
“strike fear into similarly situated non-citizen pro-Palestinian individuals…curbing lawful pro-Palestinian speech and intentionally denying such individuals…their freedom of speech.”
The judge also highlighted the ongoing chilling effect on free speech:
“The effect of these targeted deportation proceedings continues unconstitutionally to chill freedom of speech to this day.”
In a section titled “JUSTICE IN THE TRUMP ERA,” Young posed the bold question, “What now?” He reflected on the difficulty of holding the president and his administration legally accountable, quoting his wife’s description of Trump:
“He seems to be winning. He ignores everything and keeps bullying ahead.” Young wrote that her observation “perfectly captures the public persona of President Trump.”
Invoking President Reagan, who appointed him, Young noted Reagan’s warning that freedom is “a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction.” He added that Trump “truly understands and appreciates the full import of President Reagan’s inspiring message — yet I fear he has drawn from it a darker, more cynical message,” suggesting that President Trump believes Americans are too divided to defend constitutional values.
Young’s opinion ends on a personal, almost conversational note with the postcard writer:
“I hope you found this helpful. Thanks for writing. It shows you care. You should.”
Young signed off, adding a postscript encouraging Americans to witness justice in action at their local courthouses, calling them
“where our Constitution is most vibrantly alive.”
The ruling is being hailed as rare for its transparency and critique of the executive branch, blending legal reasoning with pointed commentary on leadership, accountability, and the state of democracy under Trump.
